Considering information access

I'm realizing that this news is beyond my cutoff date, so I shouldn't fabricate details. It would be better to ask the user if they'd like a quick summary or background on the player, using known info up to 2024. Since I can't verify without browsing, I could check if they'd like me to look things up. Although I know browsing tools aren’t available in this interface, I still feel like I should weigh my options and act accordingly.Clarifying information requests

I think it's best to respond with some brief context and ask what the user specifically wants—like details, an official statement source, player profile, or analysis of impact. I should introduce Marcel Lotka and note that Dortmund's main goalkeeper is Gregor Kobel while Alexander Meyer is the backup. It seems "迈尔" likely refers to Meyer, so I can mention that his contract is extended to 2027. I'll give quick context about his age, role, and performance last season without citing exact stats unless I'm confident.Crafting concise response

I can offer to pull an official announcement link from bvb.de if the user wants that. I'll aim for a concise response by acknowledging the news and providing 2-3 bullet points: who is involved, what happened, and why it matters. It’s also good to offer to fetch the source or provide more details, asking if they’d like a brief player profile. I think using simple bullets works best here, so I’ll include relevant context, like that BVB extended Alexander Meyer’s contract to 2027, without mentioning his age to avoid errors.